Thursday, April 26, 2007

Butler on Kindred

Octavia ButlerHere's an excerpt from an interview with Octavia Butler from 2004, twenty-five years after the publication of Kindred:

Joshunda Sanders: Why do you think Kindred has been one of your more popular works?

Octavia Butler: Because it's accessible to a number of audiences: black studies, oh, I guess I have to modify my vocabulary here -- African American studies, women's studies and science fiction. It sometimes reaches people who might not otherwise read that kind of book, who might not read a history, a historical novel even about that period unless it was a Gone With the Wind type.

[With Kindred] I chose the time I was living in. I thought it was interesting to start at the bicentennial and the country's 200 years old and the country's still dealing with racial problems, and here's my character having to deal with slavery all of a sudden. If I had written the book now, it probably wouldn't be very different. What I was trying to do is make the time real, I wanted to take them back into it. The idea was always to make that time emotionally real to people. And that's still what it's about. The nice thing is that it is read in schools. Every now and then I hear about younger kids reading it and I wonder how they relate to it. All too often, especially young men, will feel, "Oh, if it was me, I would just..." and they have some simple solution that wouldn't work at all and would probably get them killed. Because they don't really understand how serious it is when the whole society is literally arrayed against you and arrayed to really keep you in your place. If you get seriously out of line, they will kill you because they fear you.

Kindred was kind of draining and depressing, especially the research for writing it. I now have a talk that begins with the question, "How long does it take to write a novel?" and the answer is, as long as you've lived up to the time you sit down to write the novel and then some. I got the idea for it in college. But a lot of my reason for writing it came when I was in preschool, when my mother used to take me to work with her.

I got to see her not hearing insults and going in back doors, and even though I was a little kid, I realized it was humiliating. I knew something was wrong, it was unpleasant, it was bad. I remember saying to her a little later, at seven or eight, "I'll never do what you do, what you do is terrible." And she just got this sad look on her face and didn't say anything. I think it was the look and the memory of the indignities she endured. I just remembered that and wanted to convey that people who underwent all this were not cowards, were not people who were just too pathetic to protect themselves, but were heroes because they were using what they had to help their kids get a little further. She knew what it was to be hungry, she was a young woman during the Depression; she was taken out of school when she was ten. There were times when there was no food, there were times when they were scrambling to put a roof over their heads. I never had to worry about any of that. We never went hungry, we never went homeless. I got to go to college and she didn't even get to finish elementary school. All that because she was willing to put up with this nonsense and try to help me. I wanted to convey some of that and not have it look as though these people were deficient because they weren't fighting. They were fighting, they just weren't fighting with fists, which is sometimes easy and pointless. The quick and dirty solution is often the one that's most admired until you have to live with the results.

The entire interview is available here.

Monday, April 23, 2007

Plot hole

I'm confused... Pages 141 and 193 both mention Vessey, the man who planned to lead South Carolinian slaves in revolt. However, it seems as though Vessey's actions are taking place at two different times. Perhaps I missed something and both times are in the past, but I'm still not sure how Kevin is present in the second time. If someone could help me, that would be great!

Sunday, April 22, 2007

Rufus and Mr. Weylin

After reading more of Kindred, what does everyone think of the relationship between Rufus and his father? Is it what it should be? Is is unhealthy or healthy? Must we take into consideration the time period and the cuture at hand?

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Is someone at the door?

I just wanted to agree with Amy that this book is a page turner and captures my interest. After reading about Carrie comming up with food [p181], I started thinking about my own lunch. Suddenly, I realized I was waiting for some friend of mine to knock on my door, bringing food for us to eat... I guess if the book gets me to remember the events in it as though they're my memories, then it's a great book. ^_^

Saturday, April 14, 2007

Octavia Butler's Kindred

I (along with everyone else I'm sure) find this book very interesting. It's a real page turner. Something that ouccured to me as I was reading this was how Dana was treated concerning her relationship with Kevin. She is really his wife, but they have to play the roles of slaveowner and slaveholder. Does anyone have any reflections about how they dealt with this difficulty?

Video proof of superhuman speed

Okay, everybody. Here it is . . .

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Kindred

I really enjoyed reading this story. It is a real page turner. Parts of it remind me of Tony Morrison's Beloved. Rufus's innocence seem to make Dana feel a lot more comfortable with the situation she is in, which I found odd. I would personally feel more comfortable around my peers instead of a child but I guess when she figured out he was the same boy she saved from the river she wasn't comfortable with his parents. The suspense and longing to know exactly what is going to happen to Dana makes this a real page turner.

Does anyone feel that Dana is sent to help Rufus in order to keep her heritage alive? Do you feel that if Dana wasn't sent to help him in these events which could have resulted in him dying it would change her family history at all? Do you think the reason for her meeting Rufus was to lead her to Alice, if so why do you think she was sent to Alice?

A Conversation with Octavia Butler

Click here for that interview with Octavia Butler I mentioned in class on Wednesday.

(By the way, you probably noticed I changed the template for the blog. Some strange formatting problems were occurring when I tried to publish this post, so I just changed the template. Doing so seems to have solved the problem.)

Sunday, April 8, 2007

Trifles

Mrs. Hale seems to accuse herself of not being a friendly neighbor. I was wondering if anyone agreed with her that she is guilty. In one sense, she accuses herself of killing Mr. Wright since if Mrs. Wright had another person to talk to other than her bird, she would not have had the desire to kill her husband. Of course, this is all speculation Mrs. Hale seems to have. It would be good to note that if her theory were true, instead of Mr. Wright killing the bird, he may have killed Mrs. Hale.

Tuesday, April 3, 2007

“A &P” by John Updike and “The Secret Spot” by Alice Elliott Dark

"A & P" by John Updike

The story is basically about a boy who quits his job just because the manager talked bad to some girls who were wearing swimsuits inside the store.
Do you think Sammy's reason for quitting was worth it even though the girls did not even notice him?
In the story Sammy says: "But it seems to me that once you begin a gesture is fatal not to go through with it." Do you think he is right or do you think we can change our mind at any point in any situation?

"The Secret Spot" by Alice Elliott Dark

In the story Helen believes Julia had a affair with her husband. At the end Helen discovers that the affair never happened and that it was her husband who liked Julia. Julia seems to be a nice person, but Helen stills hates her.
Do you think Helen is right in hating Julia even though is not Julia's fault that Helen's husband likes Julia?

Sunday, April 1, 2007

"Killings" by Andre Dubus

This short story tells of a mother and father struggling with the death of their son, who has been shot by the ex-husband of his current love interest. The interesting twist is that the parents know who the killer is and, because they live in a relatively small community, must see him on a regular basis. My question is this: Do you believe that Matt did the right thing in killing Richard, or should he have let the justice system take its course? Furthermore, what would you have done if you found yourself in Matt's situation?